Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17993 (JHR)

RANJAN KUMAR YADAV @ RANJAN YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5797/2026 · 2026-06-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:18682] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5797 of 2026 ------ Ranjan Kumar Yadav @ Ranjan Yadav, Age- 25 years, S/O- Jitendra Yadav R/O- Dhawan Nagar, Kanke Road, Misirgonda alias Pahargonda, P.O. + P.S.- Kanke, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate Mr. Dilip Kr. Saw, Advocate Ms. Arti Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-25-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Gonda P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 (N) corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No.47 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 21 (b), 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale of Brown Sugar which is also known as Heroin and from the co-accused persons 11.27 gm of Brown Sugar has been recovered and they have stated that the petitioner had accompanied them to Sasaram and they were purchasing Brown Sugar from a lady namely Bhabhi. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the Brown Sugar recovered from the possession of the petitioner comes under intermediate quantity. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 17.07.2025 passed in B.A. No.5962 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.01.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner at Ranchi in connection with Gonda P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 (N) corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No.47 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-25.06.2026-Animesh/