SUNNYA KUMAR ALIAS VISHAL MAHATO ALIAS VISHAL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5782/2026 · 2026-06-25
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17992 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17992 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:18771] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5782 of 2026
------ Sunnya Kumar @ Vishal Mahato @ Vishal Kumar, Aged about 19 years, S/O- Mohan Mahto, R/O- Taranga, Sikardih Tola, P.O.- Taranga, P.S.- Chandarpura, District- Bokaro .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate
Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-25-06-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Baghmara P.S. Case No.69 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 21 of the M.M.D.R. Act and Rule 13 of the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, being the driver of the Mahindra Tipper vehicle, was transporting stolen coal. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no knowledge about the coal being transported by his vehicle; is stolen coal. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.05.2026 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Dhanbad in connection with Baghmara P.S. Case No.69 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 25.06.2026 Saroj/