IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37096 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2024 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ajit Kumar @ Lallu S/O Late Raj Kumar Rai R/O Village- Isailpur, P.S - Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 17-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that Nitish and Pappu had come to purchase gitti but an altercation took place between rival gitti seller, on account of which firing was resorted to, in which Nitish and Pappu suffered firearm injury. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37096 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation of firing is alleged against the petitioner. It is also submitted that police after threadbare investigation submitted Final Form No. 1065 of 2024 dated 29.10.2024 exonerating the petitioner and two others of the allegation as alleged in the FIR but then the learned trial court differing with the police report took cognizance, as such petitioner apprehends arrest. It is submitted that when one investigating agency after threadbare investigation came to a considered conclusion that petitioner is innocent, whether it would be prudent for the court to send the petitioner to jail based on an order of cognizance, which came to be taken, based on the same police report which exonerated the petitioner of the allegation. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37096 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 with Sadar Hajipur P.S. Case No.272 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T