[2026:JHHC:18716] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5770 of 2026 ------ Sahazada @ Shahid Khan @ Sehzada @ Sahzada, aged about 27 years, S/o Md. Aslam Khan, R/o – Taj Nagar, Bandhugora, Kapali, Near Unne Jamil Masjid, P.O. Kapali, P.S. Chandil, District Seraikela Kharsawan (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lal C.N. Shahdeo, Advocate Mr. Yash Raj Gupta, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Sushma Aind, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-25-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.199 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 95 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 118(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person and in criminal conspiracy with him, has committed murder of Vijay Tirkey. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Manish Kumar Thakur @ Ligerr and the self-confessional statement of the petitioner. It is also submitted that apart from this, there is no other material available in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.02.2026 as is evident from para-27 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Chandil in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.199 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 95 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 25.06.2026 Saroj/