Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17985 (RAJ)

RAMRATAN CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI MANGURAM v. REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES

CW/9114/2025 · 2026-01-09

Maneesh Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:727] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9114/2025 Ramratan Choudhary S/o Shri Manguram, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Sirohikalan, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur, At Present Sachiv, Sirohikalan Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Samiti Limited, Sirohikalan, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Registrar Cooperative Societies, Jaipur 2. Sirohikala Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Samiti Limited, Sirohikalan, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur Rajasthan Through President 3. Ramswaroop Choudhary S/o Shri Baulram Choudhary, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Sirohikalan, Tehsil Dudu, Districdt Jaipur Rajasthan And Presently President Sirohikalan Dugth Utpadak Sahakari Samiti Limited, Sirohikalan, Tehsil Dudu District Jaipur Rajasthan 4. Sub Registrar Cooperative Societies, Jaipur District Jaipur 5. Jitendra Yadav Arbitrator Cum Inspector, Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation, Saras Sankul, JLN Marg, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 09/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present writ petition has been filed for early disposal of interim stay application of Revision File P.3 (06) Saha/ 2025 pending before State Minister (Independent Charge) Department of Co- operative, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. However, during [2026:RJ-JP:727] (2 of 2) [CW-9114/2025] pendency of the present writ petition, the revision petition itself has been decided on 04.09.2025. 2. In that view of the matter, prayer made in the present writ petition has become infructuous, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 3. Permission sought for is granted. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 5. However, the petitioner is at liberty to move an application for revival of the present writ petition, if any cause of action still survives. 6. All other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /80