SARTAJ ANSARI ALIAS MD. SARTAJ ANSARI ALIAS SARTAJ ANARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5692/2026 · 2026-06-24
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17982 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17982 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:18519 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5692 of 2026
Sartaj Ansari @ Md.Sartaj Ansari @ Sartaj Anari son of Saukat
Ansari @ Saukat Ali
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …
… Opp. Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Sweta Singh, APP
---
02/24.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody, in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No. 96 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 115(2)/ 126(2)/ 79/ 74/ 76/ 109(1) /117(2) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned SDJM, at Hazaribagh.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed the FIR and has submitted that though there is specific allegation against the petitioner, but after the occurrence, victim did not go to the hospital or the police, she went to the village and thereafter she was taken to the hospital where she was under treatment. He has submitted that petitioner is in custody since 10.03.2026 and case has already been committed to the court of sessions.
4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the direct and specific allegation made against the petitioner, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above named on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner, above named, is rejected.
6. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 24.06.2026 Uploaded on 27.06.2026 Binit/