THE UNION OF INDIA v. SMT. GINDO DEVI WD/O NO. 13651106 GDSM (RESERVIST) GOPI CHAND
CW/9514/2024 · 2026-01-15
Inderjeet Singh, Ravi Chirania
Special Leave Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17974 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17974 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1712-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9514/2024
1. The Union Of India, Through The Secretary To The Government Of India, Ministry Of Defence, South Block New Delhi.
2. The Pcda (Pension), Allahabad (U.p.).
3. Oic Records, Brigade Of The Guards, Pin 900746 C/o 56 Apo. ----Petitioners Versus Smt. Gindo Devi Wd/o No. 13651106 Gdsm (Reservist) Gopi Chand, Aged About 78 Years, R/o Village Balwa Kalan, Post Kishan Nagar, Tehsil- Narnaul, District Mahendra Garh (Haryana) At Present Resident Of Ward No. 3, Village Badbar, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Manjeet Kaur. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yogendra Singh.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order 15/01/2026
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners fairly submits that the controversy can be brought to an end at this juncture by observing that since the controversy is pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court in SLP (Civil) Diary No.6367/2025 titled as ‘Union of India & Ors. V/s Darshan Singh Bal’, and an interim order is also operating therein, therefore, outcome of the said SLP may govern the field in the present case.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent does not oppose the aforesaid proposition.
[2026:RJ-JP:1712-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-9514/2024]
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction that final outcome of the aforementioned SLP pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court shall govern the position of law in the present case. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/84(Same)