[2026:JHHC:18714] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5777 of 2026 ------ Anand Ray, aged about 41 years, son of Arjun Rai, resident of village- Katiya, P.O.- Parsabad, P.S.- Jainagar, District- Koderma .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-25-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has attempted to murder Pawan Kumar Gupta causing injury to him. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that except injury on the ring finger of the left hand, all other injuries are simple in nature. It is also submitted that the petitioner is the Director of a kids School and the genesis of occurrence is regarding sending of a kid from the school to his house by the informant who occupies the neighbouring house of the school. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.05.2026 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 25.06.2026 Saroj/