Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1797 (PNJ)

HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LIMITED v. KAPOOR SINGH AND OTHERS

LPA/1119/2026 · 2026-04-24

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** LPA-1119-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:24.04.2026 HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS ....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KAPOOR SINGH AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate and Ms. Amisha Rana, Advocate for the applicants-appellants. Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate for caveator/respondent No.1. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) CM-2727-LPA-2026 (delay) 1. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 CPC, has been filed on behalf of the applicants- appellants seeking condondation of delay of 51 days in filing the accompanying appeal. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 51 days in filing the accompanying appeal stands condoned. Main Case (O&M) 3. Learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 insofar as claim of medical reimbursement was allowed only in part by the appellants. RAHUL JOSHI 2026.04.24 19:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD LPA-1119-2026 (O&M) 2 4. It is undisputed that the son of respondent No.1 suffered from a serious heart ailment and was admitted to MGM Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Chennai where he underwent a heart transplant. The son, unfortunately, died the very next day. Medical bills were promptly submitted. As against the bills submitted for Rs.20,30,000/-, only an amount of Rs.10,08,246/- has been reimbursed. The learned Single Judge, relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Surjit Singh vs. State of Punjab and others, (1996) 2 SCC 336, has allowed the writ petition and issued a direction to release the balance unpaid amount along with interest @6% per annum. A further direction has been given that if the amount is not paid within four weeks, then the interest would be enhanced to 9% per annum. 5. Though various submissions have been advanced on behalf of the appellants, we do not find any error in the view taken by the learned Single Judge either on facts or in law. 6. In that view of the matter, the instant appeal is dismissed. 7. The time to pay the balance amount is extended by a period of four weeks from today. 8. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] JUDGE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE APRIL 24, 2026 Rahul Joshi 1. Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No RAHUL JOSHI 2026.04.24 19:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD LPA-1119-2026 (O&M) 3 2. Whether Reportable Yes/No RAHUL JOSHI 2026.04.24 19:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD