HEMLATA DEVI ALIAS HEMLATA @ HEMLATA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5601/2026 · 2026-06-24
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17968 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17968 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:18479
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5601 of 2026
Hemlata Devi @ Hemlata @ Hemlata Kumari, wife of Jitendra Sah
… … Petitioner
Versus
State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mrs. Nirupama, Advocate
: Mr. Ashutosh Prasad Deo, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, APP
---
04/24.06.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 20.05.2026 in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No.31 of 2026, G.R. Case No.565/2026, registered under Section 126(2), 115 (2), 117 (2), 109 & 69 of BNS 2023, now pending in the court of learned C.J.M, Godda. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner happens to be the wife of Jitendra Sah and the victim has alleged that Jitendra Sah had been in a physical relationship with the victim for last 5 years. It is further submitted that so far as the allegation is concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including Jitendra Sah, who is alleged to have entered the house of the victim and assaulted her with rod. The learned counsel has then submitted that the victim has suffered simple injuries. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner based on materials on record, is not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner is a lady and there is no specific allegation so far as the petitioner is concerned and the victim having
2026:JHHC:18479
2
suffered simple injuries, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Godda in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No.31 of 2026, G.R. Case No.565/2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be her close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with her mobile number before the learned court which she will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:24.06.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:25.06.2026