[2026:RJ-JP:2353] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 577/2025 Rukmani Devi Private Iti, Through Its Principal, Suratpura Road, Sanganer, Kalwad, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Kuldeep Ranka, Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Shri Bachanesh Kumar Agarwal, Director, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Mr. Omprakash Rahar, Deputy Director (Scholarship)Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 553/2025 Nirwan University, Jaipur Near Bassi- Rajadhok Toll, Agra Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan Through Its Registrar Dr. Chandra Mohan Rajoriya S/o Shri N.l. Rajoriya, Aged 42 Years, Near Bassi- Rajadhok Toll, Agra Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Kuldeep Ranka, Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Shri Bachnesh Kumar Agarwal, Director Cum Joint Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Civil Lines, Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 578/2025 Shyam University, Dehlal-Didwana, Lalsot Bypass, Nh-11 A Extension, Tehsil Lalsot, Dist. Dausa, Rajasthan Through Its [2026:RJ-JP:2353] (2 of 3) [CCP-577/2025] Deputy Registrar Shri Rakesh Sharma S/o Hanuman Sahay Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 319, Dadu Marg, Barkat Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Kuldeep Ranka, Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Shri Bachanesh Kumar Agarwal, Director, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Mr. Omprakash Rahar, Deputy Director (Scholarship) Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 579/2025 Shri Mohan Private Industrial Training Institute, Police Line, Dausa-303303 Through Secretary, Of Parent Society Shri Agrasen Technical Education Society, Anil Kumar Goyal S/o Radhamohan Goyal R/o B-28, Roop Vihar, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Kuldeep Ranka, Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Shri Bachanesh Kumar Agarwal, Director, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Mr. Omprakash Rahar, Deputy Director (Scholarship), Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Udawat with Mr. Anirudh Sharma on behalf of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG [2026:RJ-JP:2353] (3 of 3) [CCP-577/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 20/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of order passed by this Court, after following the procedure, fresh order has been passed, hence, no contempt is made out. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners although admits that order has been passed, yet has raised objection with regard to procedure followed by the respondents while passing the fresh orders. 3. In the light of above, where, in compliance of order passed by this Court, fresh orders have been passed by the respondents, no case for deliberate and willful non-compliance is made out. Hence, the contempt petitions are dismissed. 4. Notices stand discharged. 5. However, dismissal of these contempt petitions would not prejudice rights of the petitioners to challenge the fresh orders and they would be at liberty to do so. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /21-24