Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17961 (AP)

R.V.Ramana, E- 751406 v. Sri A.K.Khan,IPS

CC/2140/2013 · 2026-03-31

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010096782013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2140/2013 Between: 1. R.V.RAMANA, E- 751406, DRIVER, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O KAMAYYA, VISAKHAPATNAM DEPOT R/O NARSIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI A K KHAN IPS, THE A.P.S.R.T.C., MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUSHEERABAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. SRI G VENKATESWARA RAO, THE REGIONAL MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., VISAKHAPATNAM REGION, VISAKHAPATNAM, 3. SRI A GANGADHAR RAO, THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to take the cognizance of the contempt of this Hon'ble Court committed by the respondents herein in disobeying and not complying with the orders issued by this Hon'ble Court Dt 4-4-2013 In WPMP.No: 12759/2013 IN W.P.No.10276/2013 by his lordship Hon'ble Justice Sri Nooty Ram Mohana Rao garu, and to punish the contemnors as per the provisions of the contempt of court Act and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. S V RAMANA The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.10276 of 2013, dated 24.10.2024 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 01.04.2026 PNS