Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1796 (JHR)

BINAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1275/2023 · 2026-01-29

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:2427 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1275 of 2023 1. Binay Kumar, aged about 63 years, Son of Mundrika Prasad. 2. Aakash Sagar, aged about 31 years, Son of Binay Kumar Sinha. Both R/o Shiv Deyal Nagar, Near Durga Mandir, P.O. Kadma, P.S.: Katamdag, District- Hazaribag. … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shashi Bala Sinha, wife of Pradeep Bhusan Verma, R/o House No. 44, Road No. 4, Patel Nagar, Chhota Govindpur, P.O.:Govindpur, P.S.: Govindpur, District: Jamshedpur, (East Singhbhum). … … ... Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY --------- For the Petitioners: :None For the State :Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P. For the opp. party no. 2 : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate Ms. Supriya Dayal, Advocate --------- 06/Dated: 29.01.2026 Heard the learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 submit that since there is no merit in this Cr.M.P., hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this Cr.M.P. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 29.01. 2026 MM