AMAR BASANT RAAJBANSH v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/12886/2026 · 2026-07-30
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17953 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17953 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 12886 of 2026 Decided on: 30.07.2026 Amar Basant Raajbansh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others
..Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Ambika Kotwal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge It appears that petitioner has grievance to an inquiry report that was furnished pursuant to the directions issued vide order dated 31.10.2025 passed in OMP No.1352 of 2025 in Civil Suit (Filing No.51792/2025) titled Amar Basant Raajbansh versus State of H.P. and others. Since the inquiry had been ordered pursuant to the directions issued in the civil suit, it is for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law qua his grievance to the said inquiry in the civil suit in OMP No.1352 of 2025 that is stated to be pending adjudication. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2
2. With the above observation, the present petition to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 30, 2026
Judge yogesh