Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17951 (JHR)

ACADEMIC QUEST THROUGH ITS SECRETARY KAMLESHWAR PRASAD SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH SRI AMITABH KAUSHAL SECRETARY DEPTT OF REGISTRATION

Cont.(Cvl)/591/2023 · 2026-06-24

Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:18523] Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No. 591 of 2023 --------- Academic Quest, duly registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 having its Registered Office at 1st Floor, Dev Bhawan, Swami Sahajanand Nagar, B.N. Singh Gate, P.O.&P.S.- Dhanbad, District- Dhanbad through its Secretary Kamleshwar Prasad Singh, aged about 65 years, son of Late Sheo Sharan Singh, resident of Lalbani, Kali Mandir Road, P.O.-I.S.M., P.S. Barwadda, District-Dhanbad (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sri Amitabh Kaushal, father’s name not known to the petitioner, Secretary, Department of Registration, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3. Sri Aditya Kumar Anand, father’s name not known to the petitioner, the Inspector General (Registration), Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 4. Sri Sandeep Singh, father’s name not known to the petitioner, the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, PO, PS & District-Dhanbad. 5. Sri Santosh Kumar, father’s name not known to the petitioner, the District Sub-Registrar, Dhanbad, PO, PS & District-Dhanbad. … …Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Shankar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Gaurang Jajodia, AC to GP-II ---------- 15/Dated: 24th June, 2026 1. The instant contempt case has been filed for alleged, willful and deliberate non-compliance of the order dated 15.05.2019 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 1917 of 2017. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted, on instructions, that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. [2026:JHHC:18523] Page | 2 3. Considering the said submission, there is no need to proceed further with the instant contempt case, as such, the instant contempt case is closed, as such, disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 24th June, 2026 Saurabh/-