APHC010097232018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4357/2018 Between: 1. ANNM KONDAMMA, W/O SREERAMULU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-36-47, RAMARAO PETA, NARSIPATNAM TOWN AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 2. NANDAVARAPU RAMA LAKSHMI, W/O SAMBA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-36-47, RAMARAO PETA, NARSIPATNAM TOWN AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. BALEPALLI PADMA, W/O SATTIBABU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-36-47, RAMARAO PETA, NARSIPATNAM TOWN AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SUNKARA NAGAMANI, W/O NAIBABU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-36-47, RAMARAO PETA, NARSIPATNAM TOWN AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. BALEPALLI KRISHNA RAO @ KITTU, S/O SATTIBABU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-36-47, RAMARAO PETA, NARSIPATNAM TOWN AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. ANNAM SRILAKSHMI, W/O LATE SRINU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-36-47, RAMARAO PETA, NARSIPATNAM TOWN AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. ANNAM NAGADEVI, W/O GOVINDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-36-47, RAMARAO PETA, NARSIPATNAM TOWN AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) 2 AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPTANAM DISTRICT. 5. YELISETTI SURYA PRAKASA RAO, S/O SATYAM, HINDU, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 36-177/2, RAMARAOPETA, NARSIPATNAM TOWN AND MANDAL. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notice issued by the 3rd Respondent vide notice in M.C.No.19/2017/D/dated 16.08.2017 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust without jurisdiction, contrary to law, against to the rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and particularly pending suit vide 0.S.N0.81/2017 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Narsipatnam and consequently set aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to notice issued by the 3rd Respondent vide notice in M.C.No.19/2017/D/dated 16.08.2017 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A S C BOSE 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. A GIRIDHAR RAO The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Harsha .S. Ammineni, learned counsel, representing Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 21.01.2026 KAS 4 158 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4357/2018 Dated: 21.01.2026 KAS