936 cp 950-24 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 936 CONT. PETITION NO. 950 OF 2024 IN WP/11737/2019 RAVSAHEB NAMDEVRAO GAIKWAD VERSUS ABHINAV GOYAL ... Mr. Shivkumar K. Mathpati, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. V. C. Patil h/f Mr. Bondar Uttam Bajirao, Advocate for Respondent No.2 …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 08/10/2026 PER COURT : 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 has placed on record the order dated 10/09/2025 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, stating that out of the ten petitioners, all except petitioner No. 5 have been held eligible for an additional increment and accordingly, the said increment has been granted to them. Petitioner No. 5, Bharat Murlidhar Satpute, has also been held eligible for an additional increment. 2. In view of the aforesaid position, the order in respect of which the present contempt petition has been filed appears to have been complied with. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of, with liberty to petitioner No. 5 to challenge the aforesaid order dated 10/09/2025 before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:47548-DB