Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17935 (CAL)

AURONEE DAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/334/2025 · 2026-03-23

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L – 63 23/03/2026 Court No.6 S.Kundu IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRR 334 of 2025 CRAN 5 OF 2026 Auronee Das Vs. State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Samin Ahmed Mr. Arijit Ghosh Ms. Avisikta Das …for the petitioner. Mr. A. S. Chakraborty Mr. Aniruddha Biswas …for the State. Mr. U. Pandey Mr. Mayank Roy …for the de-facto complainant. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for extension of the interim order. He submits that he is ready for hearing of the main matter. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the matter may be taken up for hearing. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the de-facto complainant prays for time. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the State. 5. List this matter for hearing after four weeks. 6. The interim order granted earlier shall continue for six weeks. 2 7. The State shall produce the case diary on the next date. 8. Accordingly, CRAN 5 of 2026 is disposed of. 9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)