Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010004252026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/134/2026 ASSAM MORAN SABHA AND ANR. HEAD OFFICE SORBANANDA SINGHA ROAD TINSUKIA, ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SHRI RAJIB BORAH, S/O- LATE HOLADHAR BORAH, RESIDENT OF TORAJAN VILLAGE, P.O- BORGAON, P.S.- BAREKURI, DISTRICTTINSUKIA, ASSAM. 2: MORAN STUDENT UNION HEAD OFFICE- RUDRA SINGHA PATH TINSUKIA ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
SRI NABA MORAN S/O- SRI GOPEN MORAN
R/O- VILL.- DRIAK HUNJAN
P.O.- NABAJYOTI DIST.- TINSUKIA
ASSAM- 786152 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT (S) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM-
781006. 2:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 REVENUE AND DM (S) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO GUWAHATI ASSAM- 781001. 4:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO GUWAHATI ASSAM- 781001. 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE KAMRUP(M) ASSAM- 781028 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR K K MAHANTA (Sr. Advocate), MR. K M MAHANTA,MR S GAUTAM Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 22.01.2026
Heard Mr. S Gautam, learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners. This Interlocutory application has been filed by the applicants/petitioners seeking withdraw of the accompanying writ petition being WP(C) No.7518/2022. The said writ petition was filed by the applicants/petitioners seeking a direction for quashing the eviction notice dated 10.11.2022 issued by the respondent
Page No.# 3/3 no.5 against the writ petitioner’s organization. It is submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the Government of Assam has sanctioned an amount of Rs.1,91,58,046/- (Rupees One Crore Ninety One Lacs Fifty Eight Thousand Forty Six only) for construction of building namely, “Moran Bhawan” at Guwahati, Dakhingaon, Dispur. Subsequently, another amount of Rs.4,40,51,238/- (Rupees Four Crore Forty Lacs One Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Eight) has also been sanctioned completing the whole project. Under such circumstances, these writ petitioners do not wish to press this writ petition any further and accordingly, seeks liberty to withdraw the same and approach the Court at a later date, if the grievances still persist. Mr. J Handique, learned Government Advocate, Assam, for the respondents no. 3, 4 & 5 and Ms. PR Mahanta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department, for the respondents no. 1 & 2 do not express any objection.
In that view of the matter, the Interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. The writ petition stands dismissed on the withdrawal with liberty. JUDGE Comparing Assistant