Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17929 (JHR)

RAHUL KR YADAV ALIAS ANKIT YADAV ALIAS RAJUL KR YADAV ALIAS RAHUL KUMAR YADAV ALIAS ANKIT KUMAR YAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3291/2026 · 2026-06-25

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18678 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 3291 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3291 of 2026 Rahul Kr. Yadav @ Ankit Yadav @ Rajul Kr Yadav @ Rahul Kumar Yadav @ Ankit Kumar Yadav, aged about 18 years, son of Bandhu Yadav, resident of Shobhanpur Bhatta, P.O. & P.S. Sahibganj (T), District- Sahibganj … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P. ----- 04/25.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sahibganj (T) P.S. Case No.100 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 109(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of the learned C.J.M., Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused and the allegation of firing is there against one Karan Yadav. He next submits that petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph 22 of this application. He also submits that co-accused persons have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court in A.B.A. No.1134 of 2026 and A.B.A. No.3245 of 2026. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused. ( 2026:JHHC:18678 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 3291 of 2026 5. Considering that name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 22 of this application and further, two co-accused persons in identical situation have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.As. and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sahibganj in connection with Sahibganj (T) P.S. Case No.100 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 25th June, 2026 Ajay/