Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1792 (ALL)

ROSHAN @ AKASH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/16512/2026 · 2026-05-13

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16512 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 12 of 2026, under Sections 137(2), 87 of B.N.S., Police Station- Ait, District- Jalaun. 3. The Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant has not abducted the victim. The applicant although named in the F.I.R., the victim in her statement, recorded u/s 183 BNSS, has not made any allegation against the applicant. The applicant has no criminal antecedent and he is in jail since 8.3.2026. 4. The Learned A.G.A., on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for grant of bail, however, he could not point out any criminal antecedent of the applicant. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsels for the parties and perused the material brought on the record. 6. The applicant although is named in the F.I.R., a perusal of the statement of the victim under Section 183 BNSS indicates that she was in love with the applicant and no offence has been stated to be committed by the applicant. The victim in her statement has claimed to be 18 years of age and had voluntarily gone to Rajasthan with the applicant. She did not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mehendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Roshan @ Akash .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) marry the applicant and returned back. She has stated in her statement that she wants to go with the applicant. 7. Taking into account the entire facts and circumstances of the case, prima facie, a case for bail is made out. 8. The bail application is allowed. 9. Let the accused-applicant- Roshan @ Akash, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned. 10. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. 11. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. 12. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. 13. The observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. BAIL No. 16512 of 2026 2 May 14, 2026 Vandana BAIL No. 16512 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad