2026:HHC:31453 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.166 of 2025 in CWP No.2448 of 2025 Decided on: 29.07.2026 Seema … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this execution petition, the petitioner is praying for execution of the judgment passed in her favour in the writ filed by her. 2, Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the judgment was passed by the Court in favour of the petitioner in light of the pronouncement in Satya Devi’s case and now the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has been pleased to observe that Satya Devi's case shall not be treated as a precedent. 3. Faced with this situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition, at this stage. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn at this stage. 4. The petition stands disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 29, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?