1 2026:CGHC:10883 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1264 of 2025 1 - Samson Philip (Since Died) through Legal Heirs 1.1 - 1.(A) Smt. Fibi Bai Philip (Since Died) Suitable Application Preferred) Nill 1.2 - 1 (B) Shantprakash Philip ((Died And Deleted ) Through Lrs As Per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 17-12-2025 1.2.1 - (B) (I ) Smt. Hanna Philip W/o Late Shantprakash Philip Aged About 50 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, Ward, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.2.2 - (B) (Ii) Smt. Mahima Chand D/o Late Shantprakash Philip Aged About 36 Years R/o Madan Mohan Malviya Ward Tahsil Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.2.3 - (B) (Iii ) Smt. Garima Sanduja D/o Late Shantprakash Philip Aged About 32 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, Ward, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.2.4 - (B) (Iv) Smt. Stuti John D/o Late Shantprakash Philip Aged About 30 Years R/o Dantewada, District- Dantewada (C.G.) 1.2.5 - (B) Ashish Philip S/o Late Shantprakash Philip Aged About 26 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, Ward, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.3 - 1 (C) Shanti Philip S/o Late Samson Philip Aged About 75 Years R/o Shanti Nagar Ward Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Date: 2026.03.03 16:23:03 +0530 2 1.4 - 1 (D) Surendra Prakash Philip ( Died And Deleted ) Through Lrs As Per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 17-12-2025 1.4.1 - (D) (I) Smt. Jaresh Philip W/o Late Surendra Prakash Philip Aged About 58 Years R/o Anukul Dev Ward Highkachora, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.4.2 - (D) (Ii) Smt. Namrata Disuza D/o Late Surendra Prakash Philip Aged About 45 Years R/o Anukul Dev Ward Highkachora, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.4.3 - (D) (Iii) Sanyam Philip S/o Late Surendra Prakash Philip Aged About 42 Years R/o Narayanpur, Ward No. 1 Tahsil And District- Narayanpur (C.G.) 1.4.4 - (D) (Iv) Dheeraj Philip S/o Late Surendra Prakash Philip Aged About 40 Years R/o Anukul Dev Ward Highkachora, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.4.5 - (D) (V) Late Neeraj Philip (Died Without Any Legal Heirs ) Nil 1.5 - 1. (E) Rajwant Prakash Philip S/o Late Samson Philip Aged About 52 Years R/o Shanti Nagar Ward Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.6 - 1 (F) Smt. Rabikanath W/o Subrayalnath Aged About 50 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, Ward Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.7 - 1 (G) Smt. Noorkanti Ekka W/o Libertus Ekka Aged About 67 Years R/o Behind Kali, Mandir, Sorid Ward Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 1.8 - 1 (H) Deepshikha Kujoor W/o Rajesh Kujoor Aged About 59 Years R/o Thomas Kirana Store Mother Teresa Ward Frazerpur, Jagdalpur District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.9 - 1 (I) Smt. Ratna Philip W/o Late Vijay Prakash Philip Aged About 60 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, Gundadhur Ward, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 3 1.10 - 1 (J) George Philip S/o Late Vijay Prakash Philip Aged About 48 Years R/o Rajeev Gandhi Ward, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.11 - 1 (K) Anthony Philip S/o Late Vijay Prakash Philip Aged About 45 Years R/o Shanti Nagar Ward Jagdalpur, District- District- Bastar (C.G.) 1.12 - 1 (L) Smt. Leena Wadhwani W/o Mahesh Wadhwani Aged About 43 Years R/o Shanti Nagar Ward, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) ... Applicants versus 1 - Sitaram Sharma S/o Ram Kumar Sharma Aged About 70 Years Resident Of Frazerpur Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 2 - Divya Prakash Philip S/o Late Samson Philip Aged About 44 Years R/o Of Shanti Nagar Ward No. Jagdalpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicants : Shri Sudeep Verma, Advocate. (Single Bench) Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 02/03/2026 1. Heard on IA No.01/2025, application for condonation of delay in filing the present MCC. 2. The present MCC has been filed for restoration of SA No.531/1999, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 2.5.2014. 3. As per the office note dated 26.2.2026, there is delay of 4191 days in preferring the MCC. 4. It is stated in the application for condonation of delay that the present applicants came to know about the order dated 2.5.2014 only on 15.1.2025 when they received the notice dated 6.1.2025 from the 4 Executing Court, Jagdalpur. It is also stated that the order dated 2.5.2014 was never communicated by the concerned Advocate. For all such reasons, the present MCC could not be preferred on time. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the applicants and after going through the records, this Court is of the considered opinion that the explanation offered for condonation of delay of 4191 days in preferring this MCC is not sufficient and the same cannot be accepted. Accordingly, IA No.1/2025, application for condonation of delay deserves to be and is hereby rejected. 6. Consequently, the present MCC also stands dismissed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Barve