APHC010097512007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1459/2007 Between: 1. KURRA GANGI REDDY, S/O GANGI REDDY, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 12/652, KOTA STREET, PRODDATUR TOWN & MANDAL, ...APPELLANT AND 1. MALANTHI SUDHEER KUMAR ANOTHER, S/O ACHYUTHA RAO, EMPLOYEE, SYNDICATE BANK, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the order impugned in C.C.No.193 of 2003 on the file of the I Addl. Judl. I Class Magistrate, Proddatur, dated 08.02.07 and set-aside the same is illegal and unjust. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(CRLAMP 1080 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of ''32'' days in filing the above Appeal. 2 IA NO: 2 OF 2007(CRLAMP 1949 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file the above Crl.A., to this Hon'ble Court against the Order passed in C.C.No.193 of 2003 on the file of the I Addl. Judl. I Class Magistrate, Proddatur, dated 08.02.07. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. J SESHAGIRI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1459 of 2007 J U D G M E N T: Sri N.Dada Hayat, learned counsel representing Sri J.Seshagiri Rao, learned counsel for the appellant/convict appeared through video conference would submit that as per his instructions, the appellant/complainant and respondent No.1/accused have settled the matter and entered into a compromise. Therefore, the appeal may be disposed of as settled out of the Court. 2. Heard Sri C.Panini Somayaji, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. 3. The appeal is filed by the appellant/complainant challenging the order of acquittal rendered by the trial Court for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which is a compoundable offence. Now, the learned counsel for the appellant/complainant would submit that the matter has been settled amicably between the appellant/complainant and respondent No.1/accused. 4. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as settled out of the Court. 4 As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 13.03.2026 Pmk 5 60 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO:1459 of 2007 Date: 13.03.2026 Pmk