Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25231-DB WP No. 12501 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 12501 OF 2026 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN:
SRI MANJANNA S/O LATE THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, WORKING AS POLICE INSPECTOR, CHAMRAJPET POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY, RESIDING AT NO.1112, 4TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, RPC LAYOUT, VIDYARANAGARA, BENGALURU-40.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURESH S. LOKRE., SR COUNSEL A/W SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR S R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRSENTED BY ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE 001.
2.
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.H. RAGHAVENDRA., AGA FOR R1 & R2)
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25231-DB WP No. 12501 of 2026
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 01.04.2026 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION NO.2105/2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ALLOW INTERIM APPLICATION PENDING DISPOSAL OF MAIN APPLICATION AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ and HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents No.1 and 2.
2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; i. To set aside the order dated 01.04.2026 passed by the Hon’ble Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal in Application No.2105/2026 vide Annexure-B and allow interim application pending disposal of main Application.
ii. To pass such other order/s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. What is essentially challenged is the refusal of the KSAT to grant an order of stay with regard to the show-cause notice issued to the petitioner.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25231-DB WP No. 12501 of 2026
4. The show-cause notice issued by respondent No.2 is by an authority having jurisdiction, and as such, the question of staying the show-cause notice does not arise. It is for the petitioner to reply to the show- cause notice. Since the reply has already been filed, it is for respondent No.2 to consider the same and pass necessary orders.
5. By directing respondent No.2 to pass necessary orders within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The writ petition stands
disposed of.
6. Needless, to say, until such orders are passed, no coercive steps shall be taken.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32