1 of 4 369-CA.9776.2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 369 FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.22579 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9776 OF 2017 IN FAST/22579/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS SAKHARAM RANGNATH PAWAR ... Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for the Appellant/State. ... AND FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.22601 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9774 OF 2017 IN FAST/22601/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS BHIMRAO SHANKAR ELAG … Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for the Appellant/State. Mr. Suvidh S. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent. AND FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.22592 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9764 OF 2017 IN FAST/22592/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS JANARDHAN NAMDEO ZUMBAD AND ORS … Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for the Appellant/State. Mr. Hemant U. Dhage, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. AND FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 22612 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9772 OF 2017 2026:BHC-AUG:47372 2 of 4 369-CA.9776.2017 IN FAST/22612/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS VITHAL SHRIRAM AWATE … Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for the Appellant/State. Mr. Suvidh S. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent. AND FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 22615 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9768 OF 2017 IN FAST/22615/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS GANESH ANNA ILAG AND ANR … Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for the Appellant/State. Mr. Suvidh S. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondents. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2026 P.C.:- CIVIL APPLICATIONS FOR DELAY:- 1. By these applications, the Applicant seeks condonation of delay in filing first appeals. 2. Considering the averments made in the applications, delay is condone. Accordingly, the applications are allowed. FIRST APPEALS:- 3. Since the acquisition proceedings pertain to the year 1998, 3 of 4 369-CA.9776.2017 the appeals are heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties. 4. By these appeals, the Appellants/State are aggrieved by the following Judgments and awards:- Sr. No. FA No. Date Court LAR No. 1 FA/ST/ 22579/2017 14.10.2008 Learned Adhoc District Judge, Jalna 118/2002 2 FA/ST/ 22601/2017 25.02.2009 Learned District Judge-3, Jalna 6/1997 3 FA/ST/ 22592/2017 22.04.2008 Learned District Judge-2, Jalna 573/1998 4 FA/ST/ 22615/2017 22.11.2007 Learned Adhoc District Judge-2, Jalna 07/1997 5 FA/ST/ 22612/2017 10.12.2008 Learned District Judge-4, Jalna 05/1997 5. Both the learned Advocates for the respective parties submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the SLAO. 6. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 7. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned orders. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 4 of 4 369-CA.9776.2017 8. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef