Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17901 (RAJ)

SMT. LEELA GARG W/O APOORVA GOYAL v. SMT. APARNA ARORA

CCP/563/2025 · 2026-01-23

Anand Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3326] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 563/2025 Smt. Leela Garg W/o Apoorva Goyal, Aged About 52 Years, Resident of 4-B-5, Rangbari Yojna, Near Chachu Ki Bari, Kota- 324005 (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Aparna Arora, Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, G-3/1, Ambedkar Bhawan, Near Rajmahal Palace, Jaipur 2. Deepali Bhagotia, the Deputy Director (Office Administration), Social Justice And Empowerment Department, G-3/1, Ambedkar Bhawan, Near Rajmahal Palace, Jaipur. 3. Anshul Mehandiratta, the Superintendent, Nari Niketan, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Kota. 4. State of Rajasthan through the Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, G-3/1, Ambedkar Bhawan, Near Rajmahal Palace, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Raj Yogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Udawat with Mr. Pranay Sharma on behalf of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 23/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this contempt petition alleging contempt of order dated 24.03.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4006/2025, whereby directions were given to the respondents for deciding the representation, if filed by the petitioner, by speaking order. [2026:RJ-JP:3326] (2 of 2) [CCP-563/2025] 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondents have filed reply to show that in compliance of order dated 24.03.2025, the respondents have decided the representation filed by the petitioner. 3. The order has also been placed on record along with reply. 4. In view of above, there is no case of wilful and deliberate disobedience and no case of contempt is made out. Hence, the contempt petition is dismissed. 5. Notices stand discharged. 6. However, mere dismissal of the contempt petition would not come in the way of petitioner, if he desires to challenge order dated 28.11.2025. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /78