[2026:JHHC:544] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3157 of 2025 ------ 1. Ranadhir Roy Chaudhury @ Randheer Roy Choudhury @ Ranadhir Roy Choudhary @ Randheer Rai Chaudhary, aged about 54 years, son of K. Roy Choudhury, Kamalendu Roy Choudhury. 2. Mousumi Roy Choudhury @ Mousami @ Isha Singh, aged about 50 years, wife of Ranadhir Roy Choudhury, 3. Ritwik Roy Choudhury @ Ritik Rai Chaudhary, aged about 24 years, son of Ranadhir Roy Choudhury, all residents of Alpha Flat No. 505, Srinath Residency, Anil Sur Path Road, Kadma, Marine Drive, P.O. and P.S. Kadma, District- East Singhbhum. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Nayan Soren, Son of Sri Shankar Soren, resident of Dubrajpur, P.O. and P.S. Chowka, District- Seraikella Kharsawan. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Advocate Ms. Sonal Sodhani, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA III Mr. Deepankar, AC to GA III ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-09-01-2026 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.1226 of 2021 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 12.06.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Cr.M.P. No.1226 of 2021 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 12.06.2024. It is next submitted that the petitioners prayed for time and the time was allowed subject to deposit of Rs.1,000/- by the petitioners with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA) within two weeks from the date of that order but the said deposit could not be made within the stipulated time due to lack of communication between the petitioners and the previous advocate because of personal difficulties on the part of the petitioners; which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.1226 of 2021 for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 12.06.2024. It is further submitted that non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 12.06.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.1226 of 2021 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.1226 of 2021 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel for the State has not raised serious objection to the prayer of the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.1226 of 2021 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.1226 of 2021 before the concerned Bench after one week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 09.01.2026 Saroj/