Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 179 (ALL)

MUNNA GAUTAM ALIAS MUNNA v. STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

NA528/8660/2026 · 2026-03-18

Padam Narain Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 8660 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. 2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case Crime No. 235 of 2023, under Sections 193, 211, 452, 427, 511 of IPC, Police Station- Kakadeo, District- Kanpur Nagar as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 06.02.2025 along with bailable warrant dated 14.10.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet has been submitted against them. It is further submitted that the offences are punishable up to 7 years imprisonment. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he is not inclined to press the prayer as made in the application under Section 528 BNSS and he is ready to appear before the trial court and applies for regular bail and a direction may be issued to the trial court to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously keeping in view the law laid down in Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2021) 10 SCC 773. 5. Under the circumstances, the present application under Section 528 BNSS Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harsh Tiwari, Yogesh Narayan Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Munna Gautam Alias Munna .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicant to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to enable the applicant to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 30 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. In case, the bail application is preferred by the applicant before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. While considering the bail application of the applicants, the court below shall keep in mind the principles of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2021) 10 SCC 773. 6. The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. March 19, 2026 v.k. updh. NA528 No. 8660 of 2026 2 (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad