Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17899 (AP)

N KARUNAKAR REDDY v. KANTHILAL DANDE, IAS

CC/849/2026 · 2026-03-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010099872026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 849/2026 Between: 1. N KARUNAKAR REDDY, S/O. N GOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 87/929-2-GF-1, SAI SHLOKA RESIDENCY,TELECOM NAGAR, KURNOO, KURNOOL DISTRICT- 518002. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KANTHILAL DANDE IAS, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY ROADS AND BUILDINGS (R AND B) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. P MAHESWARA REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, (R AND B) R AND B CIRCLE,DHONE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. C V SUNIL REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (R AND B) (R AND B) DIVISION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempt of 2 Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 14580/2025 dated 13.10.2025 by Learned Single Judge and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOMMA VIJAYA RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Sk. Sultana, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Komma Vijaya Raj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri P. Naga Raju, Ld. Counsel for the Respondents. 2. Sri P. Naga Raju, Ld. Counsel for the Respondents submits that the Orders of this Court have been complied with. 3. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, confirms this position that the Orders of this Court have been complied with and no further consideration is necessary. 4. Having so recorded, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 31.03.2026 MNR 4 177 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 849 OF 2026 Dt: 31.03.2026 Mnr