Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17897 (RAJ)

DR. DINESH KUMAR RANA S/O SH. O P RANA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9168/2025 · 2026-02-09

Inderjeet Singh, Ravi Chirania

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5883-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9168/2025 1. Dr. Dinesh Kumar Rana S/o Sh. O P Rana, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 126, Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Dcm Ajmer Road,, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Dr. Arvind Kumar Panwar S/o Sh. Randhir Singh Panwar, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 35 Pal Road, Vaid Raj Ji Ka Bera, Subhash Nagar, 2Nd (Rajasthan) 3. Dr. Dinesh Chandra Sarda S/o Sh. Ram Pratap Sarda, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 27, Near Choudhary Offset, Guru Ramdas Colony Extension, Guru Ramdas Marg, Udaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance (Rules Division) Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Joint Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Yadav on behalf of Mr. Bharat Yadav. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate General assisted by Ms. Dhriti Laddha. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order [2026:RJ-JP:5883-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-9168/2025] 09/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the same dispute is being adjudicated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 23246/2025 (State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Rajendra Prasad Gautam & Ors.) on 15.09.2025. They further submit that the outcome of said case will govern the field. 2. In light of such submission, the present writ petitions are disposed of with the direction that the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court shall govern the field in these matters and its outcome shall be binding on both parties. 3. The aforesaid order has been passed on consent given by learned counsel for both the parties. 4. All pending applications stand disposed of. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/34(same)