APHC010094942026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3299] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 723/2026 Between: 1. THANDRA GIRI PHANI BHUSAN, S/O THANDRA. LATE NARAYANA MURTHY HINDU, AGED 39 YEARS, R/AT D.NO. 39-9-96/6/1, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P-530007. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KAGITA NAGAMANI, S/O S. LATE SEETHARAMAYYA HINDU, AGED 44 YEARS. RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. 518/LANSUM GREENS APARTMENTS, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P53Q007. 2. SMT KAGITA NAGAMANI, W/O YEDUKONDALU, HINDU AGED 42 YEARS. RESIDENT OF D.NO. 57-23-6, SUBHASH NAGAR VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P-530008 REP BY ITS GPA HOLDER SRI AYITHAMSETTY SURYACHANDRA RAO S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA HINDU, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O 2-171, KOTHAPALEM, GOPALAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P-530027 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe above named Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition having, been aggrieved by the returned endorsement dated 06-02-2026 passed in I.A.G.R. no. 1293/2026 in nd Floor, Bh a rath i Fortune Heights, Mobile38223U3U9. O.S. no. 874/2019 on file of Principal Junior Civil Judge at Visakhapatnam for the following grounds among other IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings and operation of judgement and decree dated 09-02-2026 in O.S. no. 874/2019 on file of PJO at Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition and direct the trial court to keep the judgement and decree in abeyance until the Petitioner's impleadment as the Defendant no. 2 is duly considered and adjudicated and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAMANTHA KRISHNA SRIRAMAKAVACHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 723/2026 ORDER:- The suit O.S.No.874 of 2019 filed by the plaintiff-respondent No.2 against respondent No.1 (defendant) was decreed vide decree dated 09.02.2026 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Visakhapatnam. 2. It appears that in the said suit the present petitioner filed I.A.Gr.No.1293 of 2026 for his impleadment under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC which was returned vide endorsement dated 06.02.2026. 3. This Court is of the considered view that against the endorsement dated 06.02.2026 of the return of the application at the stage of GR in the suit, which has been decided finally on 09.02.2026, the present CRP after the decision in the suit is not maintainable. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance is with respect to the decree dated 09.02.2026 in the suit. 5. Even if it be so, then the remedy is not by way of CRP under Article 227 of Constitution of India. If a non-party to the suit is aggrieved from the decree, the remedy lies elsewhere, may be to file an appeal with the leave of the appellate Court. 6. The Civil Revision Petition is not maintainable and is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J Dated:13.03.2026 AG 82 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 723/2026 Dated:13.03.2026 AG