[2026:RJ-JP:1978-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9591/2024 1. The Union Of India, Through The Secretary To The Govt Of India Ministry Of Defence South Block New Delhi. 2. Pcda (Pension), Allahbad (U.p.). 3. The Oic Records, Rvc Records, Meerut Cantt. 250001 ----Petitioners Versus No. 7232520 Ex Swr (Reservist) Jai Chand S/o Shri Chandgi Ram, Aged About 77 Years, R/o Village And Post- Mandola Tehsil Charkhi Dadri District Bhiwani (Haryana) At Present Resident - 305, Awho, Phase-6 Near Mgps School, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10075/2024 1. The Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Defence South Block, Government Of India, New Delhi - 110011. 2. The Pcda (P), Allahabad (Up)-211014. 3. The Oic Records, Records The Mahar Regiment, Pin-900 127 C/o 56 Apo. ----Petitioners Versus No. 9207199 Ex Sep (Reservist) Kehar Singh Son Of Late Sh Jita Ram, Aged About 79 Years, Resident Of Village And Sari Tehsil Chirawa Distt Jhunjhunu (Raj) ----Respondent D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7943/2025 1. The Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Defence, Govt Of India, Dhq Post, New Delhi 2. The Chief Controller Of Defence Accounts (Pension), Allahabad (Up) 3. The Oic Records, Amc Records, Pin-900450, C/o 56 Apo. ----Petitioners Versus [2026:RJ-JP:1978-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-9591/2024] No-6789894L Ex Sep (Reservist) Budh Singh, S/o Shri Ghisa Ram, R/o Village-Nahar Khera, Post-Harsoli, Tehsil-Mundawar, District-Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Alok Garg, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 16/01/2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners fairly submits that the controversy can be brought to an end at this juncture by observing that since the controversy is pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court in SLP (Civil) Diary No.6367/2025 titled as ‘Union of India & Ors. V/s Darshan Singh Bal’, and an interim order is also operating therein, therefore, outcome of the said SLP may govern the field in the present case. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not oppose the aforesaid proposition. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction that final outcome of the aforementioned SLP pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court shall govern the position of law in the present case. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/83-85