Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17878 (JHR)

DEEP MAJUMDER ALIAS DEEP MAZUMDER v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5638/2026 · 2026-06-25

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18656 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5638 of 2026 Deep Majumder @ Deep Mazumder, Son of Niranjan Majumder … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Raj, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate --- 03/25th June 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 109 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 318(2), 318(3), 318(4), 319(2),336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of BNS and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of the IT Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned A.J.C.- II-cum-Spl. Judge Cyber Crime, Ranchi. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the allegation, an amount of Rs. 22,40,000/- has been shown to have been transacted through the bank account of the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner is innocent, rather his bank account has been used and the petitioner is in fact the victim of the case. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there has been transaction of Rs. 22,40,000/- through the bank account of the petitioner, which is reflecting from paragraph 27 of the 2026:JHHC:18656 case-diary, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, this bail application is hereby rejected. 5. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e-mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 25.06.2026 Uploaded On: 25.06.2026 Mukul/-