Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17876 (RAJ)

CHUTTAN S/O RAMSAHAI v. TEHSILDAR

CW/8113/2025 · 2026-01-15

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1606] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8113/2025 1. Chuttan S/o Ramsahai, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Khidarpur, Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur. 2. Ramnaresh S/o Ramsahai, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Khidarpur, Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur. 3. Vijaysingh S/o Ramsahai, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Khidarpur, Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur. 4. Premraj S/o Ramsahai, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Khidarpur, Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur. 5. Kadu S/o Misriya, Aged About 64 Years, Resident Of Khidarpur, Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioners/Plaintiffs Versus 1. Tehsildar, Tehsil Wazirpur 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector Sawai Madhopur 3. Gram Panchayat Mahanandpur Dyoda, District Sawai Madhopur, Tehsil Wazirpur, Through Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Mahanandpur Dyoda 4. Kamruddin S/o Umrao, R/o Khidarpur, Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawaimadhopur 5. Gillu S/o Idu, R/o Khidarpur, Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawaimadhopur ----Respondents/Defendants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmikant Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 15/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the application filed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC has been rejected merely on the ground that the pattas relating to plots Nos. 43, 41, 42, 44 & 45 were not proved to have been issued on the disputed [2026:RJ-JP:1606] (2 of 2) [CW-8113/2025] land bearing Khasra No.593/66. On this ground alone, the application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC came to be rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that subsequent to the order dated 18.03.2025, an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 was filed, pursuant to which information was supplied to the petitioners showing that the said pattas were, in fact, issued on land of Khasra No.593/66. It is submitted that at the time when the application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was decided on 18.03.2025, the document dated 08.05.2025 was not within the knowledge or possession of the petitioners. Therefore, he, prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a review application before the learned Trial Court along with the presentation of document dated 08.05.2025. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to file a review application against the order dated 18.03.2025 before the learned Trial Court, along with the presentation of document dated 08.05.2025. If the application is filed by the petitioners, the learned Trial Court is expected to decide the same in accordance with law. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/2