Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17876 (JHR)

JAHEER ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5412/2026 · 2026-06-23

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18308 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5412 of 2026 Jaheer Ansari, son of Jasamu Ansari … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Nandan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, APP For the Informant : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate --- 04/23.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2026 in connection with Chatrochatti P.S. Case No.19 of 2026, registered under Sections 69, 318 (4), 319 (2), 351 (2), 352, 3 (5) of BNS, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge-sheet has already been submitted on 19.06.2026 and that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that as per the F.I.R. itself, there was relationship between the petitioner and the victim for quite some time and their marriage had also been fixed. However, when the petitioner ultimately did not marry the victim, F.I.R. was lodged. 4. Learned counsel for the Informant has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that as per the informant, the petitioner and the victim became friends sometime in the year 2015, and at that point of time, the victim was a minor. 5. The learned counsel for the State has also opposed the prayer for bail. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and from perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that there has been relationship between the petitioner and the victim, and ultimately, when the 2026:JHHC:18308 2 petitioner and his family members refused to solemnize the marriage, the present case was lodged. The charge sheet has already been submitted. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Chatrochatti P.S. Case No.19 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:23.06.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:25.06.2026