Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1787 (UTT)

KRISHNAKANT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/106/2026 · 2026-04-02

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA No. 106 of 2026 With WPCRL No. 840 of 2025 WPCRL No. 1016 of 2025 WPCRL No. 1794 of 2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the instant anticipatory bail application as well as connected writ petitions by submitting that the applicant/petitioners will avail appropriate remedy as provided under the law. 4. In such view of the matter the instant anticipatory bail application as well as all the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 02.04.2026 Parul