APHC010093022026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5328/2026 Between: T NAGARAJU, S/O.T.KATAM RAJU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.179, PEDAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, SECRETARIATE BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI- 522503 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI-517501 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST ZONE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT TIRUPATHI- 517501 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, M.R.PALLI POLICE STATION, TIURPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, EARLIER CHITHOOR DISTRICT 517501 5. VAKATI HARI KRISHNA, S/O.LATE SUBRAHMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 18-4-104, E-RAILWAY COLONY, TIRUPATHI TOWN, POST AND URBAN MANDAL TIRUPATHI DISTRICT-517501. 6. T PRAKASH, S/O.T.ADINARAYANACHARI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/0.D.N0.6I6/H, PEDDAKAPU STREET, TIRUPATHI TOWN AND POST, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT-517501 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5328 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026 7. MADAN MOHAN NAIDU MADHUSUDHAN RAO, S/O.LATEMUNISWAMY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, KOTALA VILLAGE AND POST, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517501 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: Dr MAJJI SURI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- <…to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents more particularly the 2nd and 4rt respondents in taking considering acting on my report dt 09122025 as illegal arbitrary and violative of under Articles 14 19 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently directing the respondents particularly the 2nd and 4rt respondents to take necessary legal action on my report dt 09122025 to dispose of the same forthwith by conducting fair investigation on my supra complaint according to the procedure establish by law and to pass….= 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Sri Majji Suri Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 09.12.2025 to respondent Nos.2 and 4, but the same has not been considered by them. 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5328 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the said representation would be considered by respondent No.2, who has recently assumed charge. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.4 to take appropriate steps on the representation dated 09.12.2025 submitted by the petitioner within a period of one (01) month from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, in accordance with law. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 03.03.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5328 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026 119 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5328 of 2026 Date: 03.03.2026 RSI