Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17865 (BOM)

NASHIK GRAMIN PRASARAK MANDAL NASHIK THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SHRI. GAURAV RAJARAM PANGAVANE v. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NASHIK ZILHA PARISHAD AND ORS.

WP/997/2021 · 2026-10-13

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

902 wp997-21.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.997 OF 2021 Nashik Gramin Prasarak Mandal .. Petitioner Versus The Chief Executive Officer, Nashik Zilha Parishad and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Sugandh Deshmukh a/w Mr.Aniket Kanawade and Mr.Vaibhav Thorave, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.Pratibha J. Gavhane, AG.P. for the Respondent. CORAM: R. I. CHAGLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2026 P. C. 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has sought leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file afresh. An Affidavit on behalf of the Petitioner dated 28th September 2026 is filed wherein it is stated that in light of the subsequent events and discrepancies in the stated amounts, the Petitioner desires to withdraw the Writ Petition and is accordingly, seeking liberty to file a fresh Petition on the same cause of action. Mohite 1/2 TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Digitally signed by TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date: 2026.10.13 17:57:35 +0530 902 wp997-21.doc 2. The said Affidavit on behalf of the Petitioner is accordingly taken on record. 3. Leave is granted. 4. In view thereof, Writ Petition No.997 of 2021 is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [R. I. CHAGLA, J.] Mohite 2/2