Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:18702
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5442 of 2026
Tila Saw, son of late Bhuran Saw
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate
: Mr. P.A.N. Roy, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Achinto Sen, APP
---
02/23.06.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.03.2026 in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.35/2026, registered under Sections 80 (2), 61 (2), 3 (5) of B.N.S., now pending in the court of learned C.J.M. Latehar.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happens to be the father-in-law of the victim, who was married to his son on 15.06.2024. He submits that general allegation has been made in the F.I.R. and there is specific allegation against the husband of the victim. It is also submitted that the victim was found dead in another house where she was residing with her husband. The learned counsel submits that the charge-sheet has already been submitted.
4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail, but the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the basis of the F.I.R. is not in dispute.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it appears that the victim was living separately with her husband, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Latehar in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.35/2026, on the following conditions:
2026:JHHC:18702
2
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:23.06.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:25.06.2026