[2026:RJ-JP:7450] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 631/2023 1. M/s Anil Goyal, Through Proprietor, Anil Goyal S/o Late Shri Niranjan Lal Goyal, 33, Shivaji Chowk, Brahampuri, Jaipur. 2. M/s Gopinath Sanitary Electricals, Through Proprietor, Mukesh Kumar Saini, S/o Shri Mohan Lal Saini, 44, Kamal Kunj, Mali Colony, Chandpole Gate Bahar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. M/s Anu Enterprises, Through Its Proprietor, Shri Yogesh Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Natthi Lal Agrawal, 152/14, Shipra Path Near Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 4. M/s Divya Constructions, Through Proprietor, Rajbhadur Singh, S/o Shri Rajendrapal Singh, F-25, Kanha Vihjar, Ayodhya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. M/s Anshika Enterprises, Through Proprietor, Bhawana Jain, W/o Shri Sanjay Kumar Jain, 14, Chandanwari-Ii, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. M/s Anil Agrawal, Through Proprietor, Anil Agrawal, S/o Late Shri B.d. Agrawal, B-240, Janta Colony, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Mahendra Soni, Ias, Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Greater Jaipur, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 2. Shri Babu Lal Goyal, I.a.s., Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Greater Jaipur, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Choudhary, Ms. Pooja Dixit for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order [2026:RJ-JP:7450] (2 of 2) [CCP-631/2023] 17/02/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the order dated 31.03.2023, the respondents have not passed an order with regard to staying the office order dated 09.02.2023. Contrarily, learned counsel for the respondents submits that pursuant to the directions, the respondents neither recovered any amount nor withheld any bill of the petitioners. The petitioners have failed to show that pursuant to the office order dated 09.02.2023, any of his bill has been withheld, therefore, no contempt is made out. Heard and perused the material available on record. Considering the above facts, the civil contempt petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/8