Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:18445 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5534 of 2026
Rustam Miya, aged about 34 years, son of Juman Ansari, resident of Village Bhargaon, P.O +P.S.-Bharno, District Gumla
… … Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Victim
… … Opp. Parties ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, Advocate
---
02/24.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2026 in connection with Kairo P.S. Case No. 32 of 2024 (Special POCSO Case No. 38 of 2024) for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 376, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and section 6 of the POCSO Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum Special Judge, POCSO Act, Lohardaga.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case was lodged on the basis of complaint and it was sent to the police station for investigation. He has annexed the copy of the deposition of P.W.1, who is the victim of the case and has submitted that she has turned hostile and she has submitted that the case was filed on account of being annoyed by fight with her husband.
4.
Learned counsel for the State is opposed the prayer but does not dispute the submissions made by the petitioner based on the examination of P.W.1, the victim.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and the victim having been turned hostile, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum Special Judge,
2026:JHHC:18445 2 POCSO Act, Lohardaga in connection with Kairo P.S. Case No. 32 of 2024 (Special POCSO Case No. 38 of 2024) on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail.
7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 24.06.2026 Uploaded on: 25.06.2026 MM/-