IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 2209 of 2026 Rabindranath Panda …. Petitioner Mr. Akhand, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 07.04.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Even though the present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia challenging the rejection of the Petitioner’s claim to get the benefit of being brought over to the work-charged establishment, but in course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner fairly contended that Petitioner is not in service and has been disengaged since long. 4. In view of such submission, this Court is of the view that no illegality or irregularity has been committed by the authority in passing the impugned p. 2 p. 2 order dtd.31.03.2024 under Annexure-1. However, it is open for the Petitioner to make appropriate application seeking his re-engagement, if any. 5. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat