Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17849 (JHR)

BHOLA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5739/2026 · 2026-06-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:18494] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5739 of 2026 ------ Bhola Yadav, aged about 43 years, son of Baldev Yadav resident of village- Singho, P.O.- Gumgi, P.S.- Tisri, District- Giridih, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the State : Md. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-24-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No. 46 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant and his father by causing injury to them with beer bottle, knife, iron rod, throwing bricks, and stones. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there is allegation against the co-accused Sujit Kumar of attacking with knife blow upon the informant. It is also submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner caused injury on the head of the informant with a beer bottle. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.05.2026 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Giridih in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No. 46 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 24.06.2026 Saroj/