Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
41-WP-1779-2022.odt Harish IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1779 OF 2022 Buwa Nana Kale ...Petitioner V/S. Gena Laxman Borate And Ors. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Adv. S. G. Karandikar i/b Abhijit P Kulkarni, Shreyas R. Zarkar, for the Petitioner. Adv. Sanjay Kshirsagar, for the Respondent. ________________________________________________________
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 13TH OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. :-
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondents submit that the controversy in the instant matter is resolved by the parties and that the Compromise Pursis dated 03.05.2025 has already been signed by all the parties which is submitted before the Executing Court.
2. It is pointed out that the instant petition raises a challenge to several orders passed in the execution proceedings bearing Regular Darkhast No. 91 of 1982. It is pointed out that, in accordance with paragraph no. 5 of the Compromise Pursis (Exh. 230 in Regular Darkhast No. 91 of 1982), parties have categorically stated that the darkhast is fully satisfied. Accordingly, in view of paragraph no. 5 of the said Compromise Pursis, counsel for petitioner states that the grievance in the petition does not 1/2
41-WP-1779-2022.odt survive and therefore the petitioner wants to withdraw the instant petition. A copy of the Compromise Pursis dated 03.05.2025 is tendered across the bar. The same is taken on record and marked as document “X” for identification purposes.
3. In view of this, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) 2/2