Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1784 (CAL)

KISHORI MOHAN NASKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/1658/2026 · 2026-03-19

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19.03.2026 22 sdas WPA 1658 of 2026 Kishori Mohan Naskar Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Balai Lal Sahoo Mr. Amit Bikram Mahata …. for the petitioner Mr. Md. Manuwar Ali Mr. Milan Kumar Maity …. for the State Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy …. for the SSC Ms. Saswati Chatterjee …. for the WBBSE 1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record. 2. In spite of service, none appears on behalf of the school authorities. 3. The petitioner is a Group-D staff in the Baramara Junior High School, District- Jhargram. 4. Mr. Roy, learned Advocate appearing for the Commission, submits that the application is not in prescribed form and consideration of the same does not arise. 5. In view of the aforstated, the petitioner is directed to file an application in the prescribed form, which will be duly considered by the school authorities 2 within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of this application. 6. The suspension of ‘Utsashree Portal’ will not be an impediment for the concerned authority to consider the application for transfer of the petitioner. The same shall be considered in an offline mode. 7. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is, thus, disposed of. 8. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 9.Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)