Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1784 (ALL)

PARVEJ ALIAS PARINDA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/19853/2026 · 2026-05-13

Saurabh Srivastava

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 19853 of 2026 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. This matter has been taken up in the mentioned category. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State. 2. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of non-bailable warrant dated 06.03.2025 passed in Case No.10113 of 2021 (State of U.P. vs. Aafeem and Others) under sections 379, 411 IPC, arising out of Case Crime No.414 of 2021, P.S. Pilkhuwa, District- Hapur, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur. 3. On perusal of entire record appended along with instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned in pursuance to NBW order dated 06.03.2025 to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankita Tiwari, Kushagra Srivastava, Saumya Srivastava, Shahrukh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Parvej Alias Parinda .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) applicant is hereby directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to impugned NBW order dated 06.03.2025 within 15 days from today. Till 15 days from today, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of 15 days, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law. 7. Lastly, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has already been granted bail and as such learned court concerned may not compel him to prefer fresh bond and surety. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. May 14, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 19853 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad