Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17839 (JHR)

SIKANDRA KUMAR GANJHU @ SAKINDRA KUMAR GANJHU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5733/2026 · 2026-06-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18554 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5733 of 2026 ------ Sikandra Kumar Ganjhu @ Sakindra Kumar Ganjhu, aged about 21 years, son of Vishu Ganjhu @ Vishun Ganjhu, resident of Village –Sikni, P.O. & P.S. –Lawalong, District – Chatra. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sushant Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.54 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1292 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 309(5)/61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 25(6)/25(7)/25(1-A)/25(1-B)a/26/31/35 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was planning to carry out a major offence and the co-accused was in possession of a country made pistol loaded with four rounds of live cartridges and a magazine loaded with four cartridges was recovered from another co-accused person, whereas five live cartridges were recovered from the co-accused –Teju Kumar Bhokta. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 17 of the bail application. It is then submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Hazaribagh, in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.54 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1292 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 24.06.2026 Sonu/