COCP-675 IN THE HI 221 Pardeep Sing Smt. Shailen CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW vs. State of directed to above referr case, it is fo representatio petitioners w 2. instructions Singh-Clerk, compliance Speaking Or 675-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o p Singh and others Versus hailender Kaur M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate fo Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Mr. Ranjodh Singh, Supdt. Grad Mr. Harpreet Singh-Clerk, Hort I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 01.09.2025 (Annex CWP-25680-2025 titled as titled a ate of Punjab and others’ whereby to ‘.... pass a speaking and well rea eferred judgments as well as relev is found that the petitioners are en tation, consequently, all benefits ers within a period of one month, the At the very outset, learned tions from Mr. Ranjodh Singh, Supd Clerk, Horticulture Department, Pu iance of the Writ Court order dated ing Order dated 17.03.2026 has been ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-675-2026 Date of Decision: 18.03.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA cate for the petitioners. AAG, Punjab assisted by t. Grade-I and , Horticulture Department, Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ itled as ‘Pardeep Singh and another ereby the respondents have been l reasoned order in the light of the relevant rules/instructions and in e entitled to relief claimed in the fits may also be released to the , thereafter, along with interest’. arned counsel for the State on , Supdt. Grade-I and Mr. Harpreet nt, Punjab, has informed that in dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure P-1), been passed by the respondent, as ging Writ een he in he he on reet t in 1), , as RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-675 per which accepted and S/o Harbhaj No. 4 and 7 counsel furt remaining pe released with 3. Court by lea copy thereof 4. the above un the present p revive the sa 5. 6. required to b of, with liber 7. 8. 18.03.2026 rishu 675-2026 -2- hich cases of 09 petitioners, out of to d and approved. However, 02 petitio arbhajan Singh and Jobanpreet Singh and 7 respectively, are not found elig el further undertakes that the neces ing petitioners i.e. petitioners No. 1 t ed within a period of 01 month. Copy of Speaking Order dated by learned counsel for the responden hereof, has been handed over to learne Learned counsel for the petitio ove undertaking given by learned cou esent petition may be disposed of, with the same in case, any cause of action Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition th liberty to the petitioner(s) as aforesa Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable t of total 11 petitioners have been petitioners, namely, Pawan Kumar Singh S/o Dalbir Singh/petitioners nd eligible for the benefit. Learned necessary dues in respect of the o. 1 to 3, 5, 6 and 8 to 11 shall be dated 17.03.2026, handed over in ondent-State is taken on record. A learned counsel for the petitioners. petitioners submits that in view of ed counsel for the respondent-State, f, with liberty to the petitioner(s) to ction still survives. above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed foresaid. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No een mar ners rned the ll be r in d. A of tate, s) to are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.