( 2026:JHHC:18312 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3783 of 2026 Nitish Kumar son of Yogendra Prasad Yadav … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, APP --- 03/23.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 37 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 111(2) (b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4),338,336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and section 66B, 66C, 66D and 84(C) of I.T. Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is alleged that one mobile phone and two SIM Cards have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 10.03.2026 and charge sheet has already been submitted. Two co-accused namely Aslam Ansari and Rahul Kumar Das have been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court in B.A. No. 4487 of 2026 and in B.A. No. 4579 of 2026 respectively. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail but by referring to the case diary and the crime links which have been found against the accused persons in this case he submits that there is no crime link and no FIR has been registered against the petitioner in any of the State. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner having no criminal antecedent and no other FIR has been mentioned to be registered against the petitioner, no crime link has been reported in ( 2026:JHHC:18312 ) 2 paragraph 61 of the case diary, co-accused having been enlarged on bail and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber crime Cases, Deoghar, in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 37 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 23.06.2026 Uploaded on 25.06.2026 Binit/